SWAYAMSEVAK’S STORY: Advani’s Aurobiography is RSS version of Events

Ram Puniyani


Undoubtedly there are some serious mistakes like the narration of the hanging of Bhagat Singh, but how can one expect a Hindu nationalist to know the life events of an atheist, communist, dead against the politics promoted in the name of religion, which Advani practices. Then there is a deliberate presentation that he, despite being Home minister, was not the part of decision making process of Jaswant Singh accompanying the terrorists to Kandhar.


This is a deliberate lie, but with a purpose. The idea is to present himself as someone who is ‘hard’ against terrorism, and not responsible for the mistakes of NDA regime. At the same time he takes the credit for the all the supposedly good actions during NDA regime. Than there is a deliberate silence at places, that of details of death of his political mentor, Shyama Prasead Mukerjee, or expulsion of hardliner Balraj Madhok from President ship of Bhartiya Jan Sangh, the previous avatar of BJP. All this should be expected as being primarily a swayamsevak, who has taken oath to work for the Hindu nation, meaning there by to usurp the democracy, he will tell us what suits his political goals and leave out the uncomfortable incidents from his log book of history.


What comes out from this massive volume is the mind set, the politics which RSS has been pursuing and its actualization in the political arena from the decade of 1980s. What comes out is the very sophisticated presentation of the ideology of RSS, its view of history, nationalism, culture and politics and what have you. Indoctrinated in the shakha baudhhiks (RSS branch ideological sessions) and inspired by Mookerjee and Deendayal Upadhyay, this swaymsevak does the best advocacy of the ‘divisive’ ideology and its role in pushing back the values of freedom movement.


One also wonders about his very title, My country: My Life. By My country, apparently he refers to India, as it came to be after it attained independence. During that time, the whole country, the Indian nation was striving to fight against the British colonialists, barring of course the Muslim League-RSS-Hindu Mahsabha. How can the followers of RSS, or religious nationalism of any variety for that matter, call this democratic secular nation as their country as their notion of nationalism is far removed from what most of the people of this country accepted and there by followed the path shown by Gandhi and the values delineated by the likes of Bhagat Singh and Ambedkar.


While currently, Advani ilk talks of nationalism in an aggressive manner, as a matter of fact when this Nation was coming into being, they were conspicuous by their absence from the process of nation formation. When as a young recruit of RSS he was digesting the indoctrination of RSS ideology, the youth of his age were breaking the British laws to ensure that our motherland gets freedom. When he was imbibing the ‘cultural nationalism’ of RSS, Ambedkar was condemning the Brahminic theology of Hinduism, the very base of RSS cultural nationalism.


His crocodile tears at the death of Gandhi are displayed a wee bit shamelessly. While talking of Gandhi murder as a sad event, the rath yatri forgets to mention that the murder was done by none other that his fellow swaymasevak, Nathuram Godse, who was also holding concepts of nationalism about which the author talks so gloriously all through in the book. His fascination for Deendayal Upadhyay reveals the deeper ideology of Hindu Rashtra. Upadhyay is credited with the ideology of Ekatma Manvad, Integral humanism, the indirect defense of the Varna system in current times.


The fortunes of RSS changed for better with Jaya Prakash Narayan letting RSS combine become part of the movement led by him. Now it comes out that this movement was to be the turning point in Indian politics, by giving legitimacy to the murderers of the father of the nation and by opening the way of Hindu nationalism, which came to assert itself over a period of time. While describing the break down of Janata Party, he puts the blame on others, while the real issue was that socialists like Fernandes and Rajnarayan were very forthright in saying that Jana Sangh faction should dissociate from RSS if it wants to continue being part of janata party. The Janasangh faction of Janata Party, (Vajpayee, Advani, Varma) decided to break the Janata party rather than severe the connection with RSS, and that’s how the party broke. Interestingly at that time and till quite late George Fernandes was the most vocal critics of RSS-BJP and its fascist ideology. In this book Fernandes finds a very cozy mention, as the political opportunism of Fernandes and political expediency of BJP brought them together and is keeping them together as NDA, so much for the ‘honesty’ of the narrative.


The shift away from Gandhian Socialism, the ideology of BJP as enunciated at the time of its formation finds no ideological treatment in this tome. Why they picked it up in the first place and what made them abandon this ploy? One is raising these questions knowing fully well that one does not expect RSS volunteers to answer them, as the goals justify the means for this brand of politics. The taking up of Ram Temple issue is elaborated in great detail and with this the communal historiography, Muslim kings destroyed Hindu temples, and all other Shakha baudhik outpouring, which is strengthening communal divide is dished out by him in a very clever manner. What also becomes apparent here is that Advani was never shaken or disturbed by the real life deprivations of dalits, poor or the workers. What comes clearly is that the major problem for Advani has been the issues related to identity, in contrast to issues of bread, butter, shelter and rights. It is this identity polices which made Advani what he is.


With Ram Temple issue, the national identity is made to veer around lord almighty. And while asserting that, this Hindutva warrior does state that he does not want a theological state, thank you sir! But what else can he say. While the whole nation was talking of India, multi religious, diverse and multicultural, RSS was talking of a political system based on monolithic, Brahimised Hinduism called Hindutva. So Advani’s effort to project Lord Ram as the symbol of Indian nationalism is ludicrous but it did help his political agenda to no end. It did lead to demolition of a centuries old mosque and the carnage targeted against minorities. Babri dispute is also presented through the prism of Hindu fanatical ideology, never questioning how British introduced the divisive communal historiography through their gazettes and through the history books. The sources he cites for Ramjanm Bhumi temple being there, the courtier account etc. should be laughing matter for serious historians. But that’s what suits his politics.


Life has many contradictions and surprises. This man wants to build a Ram temple at the site, where Babri masjid stood. He says that the Kar Seva on 6th December 1992 will be done with bricks and shovels. His colleagues, the part of Ram Temple movement assert that they will destroy the mosque and the debris will be thrown in river Saryu. Then his followers do precisely what is told to them and what is desired by the Advani clan. If that is what they have been saying then how come they should endeavor to stop them while kar sevaks are demolishing the mosque, is beyond one’s comprehension. The claim that the RSS combine leadership on the stage tried to stop the demolition, is probably amongst the biggest and most convenient political lies of the history of current times. His colleagues are celebrating, hugging each other, distributing sweets and this gentleman wants us to believe that it was the dark day of his life! Probably he is too shrewd and astute in his political calculations for posterity.


As a build up to the demolition he propagates that the masjid is a sore on the eyes of nationalism. Probably he knows indoctrinated history only as much as is needed as an ideal RSS swaymsevak. Who will tell him that the mosques and temples were destroyed and built more as a political calculation by the kings rather than for religious considerations alone. He will not like to know that the biggest temple in Ayodhya, Hanuman Garhi was built on the land donated by Nawab of Awadh or that the same Aurangzeb who destroyed many a temples also gave huge donations to many a Hindu Temples.


The build up to Babri demolition was preceded by implementation of Mandal Commission, some thing which his party could not handle. If they support it they loose their core upper caste Hindu constituency, if they oppose it they weaken themselves on electoral wicket, so they seek the help of Lord Ram at this juncture. His revered other leader, the one famous as the Mask of RSS, Vajpayee, put it very aptly by saying that they brought in Mandal so we had to resort to Kamandal (Religiosity) in our politics. Post Bari violence is totally bypassed, violence following the Rath yatra is underplayed and attributed to everything else except their real cause the Yatra. Yatra is all milk and honey, pseudo secular trouble makers are doing the violence and projecting is as Blood yatra, how wrong of them, Mr. Ram Sevak!


The whole view of things is ‘genuinely saffron’, in this account. If one wants to know the trajectory of RSS combine on political chess board, here is the book. The nuclear arms race triggered by the Pokhran and then Advani’s, threat to Pakistan, now we have a bomb, dare you assert yourself. And then in reply to India’s five explosions Pakistan does six and silently tells Advani yes we also have it and if we occupy Kargil, what will you do baring requesting Uncle Sam to make us withdraw? But all this is not the part of Advani story, where the nuclear explosion is a national honor and his colleagues celebrate it by planning to spread the ‘holy’ Pokhran sand all over the country so that their ideological cancer is supplemented by physical cancer! Any way mercifully the later was not done and nation needs to thank these ‘nuclear nationalists’ for their kindness in sparing us the spread of radioactive nuclear material!


How to defend a fellow swaymasevak who has presided over a mass carnage can be nicely learnt from the chapter on Gujarat. Advani bypasses all other versions and reports to defend Modi’s actions. If Godhra train was burnt (implication, by Muslims) why you should at all consider the Banerjee report whose opinion is contrary to that of his fellow swaymasevak. If Gujarat Forensic lab gives the report that fire could not have been put from outside, how can we take that into consideration. And see there were so many other acts of violence, so why single out Modi for this one. The reports by various human rights groups have no meaning. All is well in Gujarat, the Supreme court is transferring cases out of Gujarat as the possibility of getting justice there does not exist, so what? Gujarat is prospering and Modi as a true RSS worker is ushering in Hindu Rashtra there, relegating minorities to the second class citizen status, what can be a bigger joy for this ‘nationalism’, as his nation is coming to fruition by and by. He doggedly defends Modi, and anoints this mass murderer of Gujarat as his successor, what more can speak of his politics.


There is enough material in the book to understand the politics and planning of RSS. The trivial things apart, Advani shows the glimpse of things planned by RSS. Gujarat is the way and BJP will gradually bring in such a state of affairs as outlined by their most revered Guruji, Madhav Sadashiv Golwalkar, who ordained that Minorities submit to the wish of majority (RSS) else they will have to live as second class citizens. And one does get this frightening picture after going through this book.


It shows the mechanism of RSS combine also. You need a suave, soft spoken person at the top till you come to full power. That’s why Vajapyee had to be the Primer minister despite the fact that it was Advani who led the Babri demolition and Hindutva onslaught on Indian democracy. With Vajpayee, retired, some one has to take that place and Advani with his mannerism and expressions which are soft, fits the bill till they come to power and than of course it will be Modi’s day, Modi, with classic fascist persona (a la Ashish Nandy), is already waiting in the wings to impose the Hindu Rashtra.  What is most frightening about the book is that communal common sense manufactured by RSS shakhas and propagated by various other means has been presented as a sugar coated pill by this wily swayamsevak turned politician in the service of Hindu Rashtra.   




Sujay Mehdudia


Reacting strongly to State Department Deputy Spokesman Tom  Casey’s observations in Washington on Tuesday, the spokesman of the Ministry of External Affairs said India could do without any guidance in the matter.


Refuting the official American presumption to advice New Delhi, the spokesman said: “It is important that the genius of each nation living in a particular region is respected and allowed to flower to meet the expectations of enriching relations with neighbors.”


Mr. Casey said Washington wanted India to talk tough with Iran during the Iranian President’s visit, hoping it would ask Tehran to suspend its uranium enrichment activities in line with the U.N. Security Council’s demands.


Washington would also encourage New Delhi to ask Iran to “become a more responsible actor on the world stage” by ending its “rather unhelpful activities” regarding Iraq and support for terrorism, Mr. Casey told reporters. He, however, said it was up to India to decide how to manage its bilateral ties with Iran.


The spokesman said: “Our attention has been drawn to a comment made by the official spokesman of the U.S. State Department concerning the visit of President Ahmadinejad to India. India and Iran are ancient civilizations whose relations span centuries.


“Both nations are perfectly capable of managing all aspects of their relationship with the appropriate degree of care and attention. The situation in the region has always drawn the attention of both the nations and it can be seen perfectly well that these have been managed through continuous dialogue and exchange of delegations at various levels.


“Neither country needs any guidance on the future conduct of bilateral relations as both countries believe that engagement and dialogue alone lead to peace.”


(The Hindu April 23, 2008)

Top - Home